The Carillon is the student paper at the University of Regina. In the back of the paper every week, they have a really fun “declassified ad” section also known as “5 lines free” for students and the university community. In the last few months the “declass” has been overrun by spammy ads for “Swiss product”, “700% growth”, doors, soup, and you name it. After I complained in a free ad of my own, an editor responded by saying that these spams were paying to appear.
Anyway, I figured I should plug a newly starting non-profit co-op in Regina, and 3 weeks ago I submitted the Regina Car Share Cooperative’s website address: reginacarshare.blogspot.com . The Carillon published it… wrong. Regina Car Share turned into Regina CARE Share. This type of mistake was nothing new to me. As a student years ago I used to submit my university web site address almost weekly, and of the about 20 times I tried to have it published, perhaps only 5 of them were completely successful. They spelled the URL wrong every other time, and it was NOT my printing that confused them (I have excellent printing, and I should know, I passed grade 2. Staff at the Carillon on the other hand…).
Still, maybe I shouldn’t pick on what is mostly a volunteer paper. These people are still learning the basics of journalism, like fact checking, spelling, and not repeatedly screwing up ads for your readers / contributors / potential paying sponsors. I could understand if it happened once. I could maybe even forgive twice. But more than a dozen times over the years? Good golly, that’s some poopy typing/reading/spelling on their part! It hasn’t always been the same person doing the data entry either. What’s the problem? I’ve honestly considered it’s a conspiracy against me, that’s how bad it is. What else could explain it?
Why am I ranting now when this happened weeks ago? Well, I tried to have it published correctly in the paper after the first typo was printed. I submitted it just before the deadline, and sat in the paper’s office, putting my bag on a table while I wrote out my cheeky second attempt. A Carillon contributor then carelessly tossed my bag off the table to make hurried room for some newly arrived pizza boxes, and didn’t look at me while I suggested he could have asked me to move my bag more carefully than he had. Maybe talking back is why they MISPRINTED THE URL AGAIN! They left out a letter in “blogspot”.
When I saw that I just started laughing. What else could I do? Oh, I know — submit it a 3rd time! The third time’s the charm, and that’s what I said right in my submission to the paper, with the URL, and a request to “please” not misspell it again. They didn’t misspell it the 3rd time. They just included a period right after the URL, so newbies to the web still won’t type it in properly if they do it literally. Ugh. Ugh. Sigh.
The Carillon tried to redeem itself (indirectly) by providing a funny insert called “The Gopher” (a poke at the free left wing Prairie Dog also distributed on campus). Yet the Prairie Dog has always spelled my URLs that I give them, properly. I wonder why that is…
==
For those curious diners out there, don’t bother trying a tomato, lettuce, blue cheese sandwich, and drinking grape-cranberry juice with it. The sandwich is great because the salty cheese is just right for the tomato. But the salt and pungent taste goes very badly with the flavourful juice, and the combination ends up tasting like barf. And not this stuff either (but that must taste bad too).
==
–
Hat tip to Hugh Mcguire
==
And we’ll close off this random poop with some pop music that is hard to get out of your head.

@hotmail.com





![[EFC Blue Ribbon - Free Speech Online]](http://www.efc.ca/images/efcfreet.gif)
Stephen Walters | 11-Apr-08 at 4:05 am | Permalink
Stephen Taylor is dropping Small Dead Animals from the blogging tories. At least, that’s the rumour.
Aurelia | 11-Apr-08 at 11:13 am | Permalink
Dude,
You sound depressed….reality is that once spellcheck was allowed and endorsed by teachers everywhere, spelling became a lost art. So I’m not surprised that no one can spell at the student newspaper.
It’s kind of amusing, because if no one can spell in real life, then who will program the spellcheck programs in software?
Good luck in the struggle!
Saskboy | 11-Apr-08 at 2:03 pm | Permalink
I am today. But yesterday when I wrote this I was on top of the world and had a great time writing it too. It’s mostly in jest.
Saskboy | 11-Apr-08 at 2:04 pm | Permalink
Thanks for the update Stephen, I saw someone else who heard that rumour too. I’d ask him myself, but he’s not online right now it looks like.
gfr | 11-Apr-08 at 7:15 pm | Permalink
They’re just shooting themselves in the foot with the car share thing. Students are probably one of the big groups who don’t have cars because they can’t afford them, but like everyone else, they could probably occasionally use one. (They’re also among the younger cohorts in the population and will likely suffer the effects of climate change and other ecological problems disproportionately.) So messing up the ad does a poor job of increasing the car share’s visibility and may make it less popular and if it’s not popular enough, it may not work out and shut down. Or maybe not, but it’s comforting to think so. Or maybe it isn’t.
bartkid | 15-Apr-08 at 11:38 am | Permalink
If I may proffer a - I hope - helpful suggestion.
Set up a reginacareshare.blogspot.com blog had have it automatically redirect to the correct link.
Saskboy | 15-Apr-08 at 11:49 am | Permalink
Not a bad idea bartkid. I may do it in some spare time, since it probably won’t be the last typo made.
Mac | 17-Apr-08 at 4:03 pm | Permalink
Perhaps if you actually paid for the ad they would have taken the time to spell it correctly.
Saskboy | 17-Apr-08 at 7:48 pm | Permalink
Oh Mac, I believe I covered that already:
“not repeatedly screwing up ads for your readers / contributors / potential paying sponsors.”
If they don’t respect their readers, non-profit organizations, or carefully enter reader submissions, then why would a paying sponsor trust them with their reputation?
EDIT: Plus there’s another word for making some people pay for a service that is free to others (otherwise you’ll harm them): extortion. Right? Please suggest other synonyms.
Mac | 20-May-08 at 9:43 am | Permalink
If you read the paper you’ll notice that paying sponsors very, very rarely use the declass to advertise because it’s not all that effective (people don’t read them, they just jump to the next funny).
Paying sponsors develop, create and send in fully-finished graphic ads that get dumped in. If there’s a mistake on it, it is because they don’t know how to proofread before they submit.
If you really are trying to spread the word, and this cause is so important to you, stop being a cheap ass.
Saskboy | 20-May-08 at 12:25 pm | Permalink
Again Mac, it’s not about the price, it’s about the quality of work put in by The Carillon. If it’s going to do the declass half-assed, (assuming you work for them) THEY shouldn’t complain about people being “cheap ass”. My full ass is involved in spreading the word about good things, cheaply. If the Carillon is only going to give a half-ass for my cheap-ass, people will take their butts (and associated eyes) elsewhere. It’s not like the Carillon is the only free paper (on campus even). In fact, if you do work for them, you’re doing a great disservice to the paper by talking to me the way you are.
FNUniverse | 15-Jul-08 at 7:40 pm | Permalink
Re: Quality Control
pssst … check this out
http://web.mac.com/fnuniverse/FNUniverse/News/Entries/2008/3/15_Carillon_pokes_FNUniv_two_weeks_running.html