Troop exchanges have been routine, and are a good idea. But this kind of limp leadership from Harper is just another reason he borders on being a traitor. It’s one thing to send emergency aid. Yet this smacks of giving the USA a head start if they ever wanted to claim our resources for their own.
America of the future might say - Oh, what’s that? An emergency in the north? We’d better send our military to help out…
I’m pretty sure it’s Harper who is French and not Dion. Who seems more ready to run up the white flag (as the stupid French slur goes, right)?
If the States wanted to invade Canada, legislating their entry isn’t going to make it possible, because it already is possible. If Americans were starving, dehydrating, or freezing/cooking to death, it wouldn’t take long for Fox News and CNN to turn them against Canada anyway. They know next to nothing about us, and a good foundation for demonizing a country’s people is abject ignorance. The part about Canada having the resources required to NOT DIE, would be ample motivation for America to go to war, seeing as that was the motivation for Iraq, and at the time Americans were not dying by the 10s of thousands like would happen with a famine or widespread drought.
This is all unlikely to happen, thank goodness. Yet it’s still a disturbing trend to see the Canadian government making significant encroachments upon our sovereignty, while the vast majority of Canadians hear nothing of it, and its possible implications. If Harper really is sincere about boosting the strength of our army, and don’t intend to use them to defend us against natural disaster, and keep us independent of invading armies, then what’s the real purpose of his spending money on a military force? Is he going to sign away our rights to the North next, behind closed doors?
A portion of the canada.com article is here:
The left-leaning Council of Canadians, which is campaigning against what it calls the increasing integration of the U.S. and Canadian militaries, is raising concerns about the deal.
“It’s kind of a trend when it comes to issues of Canada-U.S. relations and contentious issues like military integration. We see that this government is reluctant to disclose information to Canadians that is readily available on American and Mexican websites,” said Stuart Trew, a researcher with the Council of Canadians.
Trew said there is potential for the agreement to militarize civilian responses to emergency incidents. He noted that work is also underway for the two nations to put in place a joint plan to protect common infrastructure such as roadways and oil pipelines.
“Are we going to see (U.S.) troops on our soil for minor potential threats to a pipeline or a road?” he asked.
Trew also noted the U.S. military does not allow its soldiers to operate under foreign command so there are questions about who controls American forces if they are requested for service in Canada. “We don’t know the answers because the government doesn’t want to even announce the plan,” he said.
But Canada Command spokesman Commander David Scanlon said it will be up to civilian authorities in both countries on whether military assistance is requested or even used.
He said the agreement is “benign” and simply sets the stage for military-to-military co-operation if the governments approve.
“But there’s no agreement to allow troops to come in,” he said. “It facilitates planning and co-ordination between the two militaries. The ‘allow’ piece is entirely up to the two governments.”
If U.S. forces were to come into Canada they would be under tactical control of the Canadian Forces but still under the command of the U.S. military, Scanlon added.
News of the deal, and the allegation it was kept secret in Canada, is already making the rounds on left-wing blogs and Internet sites as an example of the dangers of the growing integration between the two militaries.
On right-wing blogs in the U.S. it is being used as evidence of a plan for a “North American union” where foreign troops, not bound by U.S. laws, could be used by the American federal government to override local authorities.
“Co-operative militaries on Home Soil!” notes one website. “The next time your town has a ‘national emergency,’ don’t be surprised if Canadian soldiers respond. And remember - Canadian military aren’t bound by posse comitatus.”
Posse comitatus is a U.S. law that prohibits the use of federal troops from conducting law enforcement duties on domestic soil unless approved by Congress.