Some bloggers haven’t had enough fun yet picking apart and over-analyzing my efforts to co-run an Canadian blogosphere awards site (for the entire Canadian blogosphere) with several other bloggers of different backgrounds. So here’s a post to go wild, and vent a little at me who is at least partially responsible for ruining Christmas, or whatever next I’ll be accused of doing.
Caution, if you try to be nice to me here, I’ll assume you’re being sarcastic. :-)
Since I closed the comments on the latest announcement, some bloggers have been buzzing about how the CBA Operator’s solution to the threats of boycotts and bad feelings, has been less than completely satisfying, or a complete screw up like the last attempt to resolve matters through compromise.
Some have gone to such a level of not caring what happens, that they write numerous lengthy blog posts on the subject. I’ve asked Canadian Cynic, impolitely, to mind his own bee’s wax. Dave at TGB had a more thoughtful post on the subject of standing aside. But he too argues for an exclusion of some bloggers because ‘they just don’t mix’ well enough. Co-blogger Dana, unfortunately, would be happier boycotting any part of the Internet I’ve touched, lest he (Corrected, sorry Dana, I didn’t know it was a gender neutral name, I’ve only met female Danas before.) get Saskatchewan boy cooties.
There is, perhaps, some belief that once we all get down in the dirt, we’ll drop our coloured ties and just get along in a good old Canadian polite competition. That won’t happen.
The ideological differences are too great and because of that, awards of this type might work best if both sides stayed in their own camp.
I think there’s something to be said for sitting down together, even if you don’t like the people on the other side of the table very much. Sometimes familiarity breeds contempt, but so too does ignorance. We like to think of ourselves as experts on other people and their intentions, but after being an expert for so long, does one become more ignorant of other fields?
Anyway, now I’m a lightening rod for discontent on the Canadian political interwebs. Good thing my online-skin is thicker than it is in the real world because online I’m apparently an… “outright liar”, “hapless cluster monkey”, “assmonkey”, “monkey” (have these people seen me without my shirt on by chance?), “Biggest Asshat in Canada”, “Disingenuous ass hat”, “useful idiot”, “fucking predictable”, “irredeemable”, “obtuse” (not the first time someone’s claimed that; they may have a point ;-), “insecure”, “impervious”, “boy from Saskatchewan”, and “sexy”.
OK, I made that last one up to make me feel a bit better ;-)
==
UPDATE: I see CC offered a sort-of apology here after I’d written this, but I’d already posted it before I went to bed last night, so didn’t see it before the world read this.


@hotmail.com





![[EFC Blue Ribbon - Free Speech Online]](http://www.efc.ca/images/efcfreet.gif)
sheena | 22-Dec-07 at 10:20 am | Permalink
OK now THAT picture is the money shot for the T-Shirts.
Berlynn | 22-Dec-07 at 11:46 am | Permalink
Is this like bingo? Cuz obtuse and insecure are listed on my card, under SaskBoy! But there’s no free on this card; no free rides, I guess…
Buster | 22-Dec-07 at 12:03 pm | Permalink
An election or vote which allows unlimited people to vote an unlimited amount of times is not a vote, it is a fraud.
Actually its worse than fraud in that your system basically rewards people who cheat the most; if anything it is a “most evil person” contest. The Canadian blogsphere is of manageable size and there is no good reason why you can’t allot one *public* ballot per blog (maybe plus one for commentors) and have an open and transparent process…unless you are actively participating in fraud.
LuLu | 22-Dec-07 at 12:14 pm | Permalink
Co-blogger Dana, unfortunately, would be happier boycotting any part of the Internet I’ve touched, lest she get Saskatchewan boy cooties.
Dana’s actually a man. A little research never killed anyone but, hey, why take the chance, right?
Chimera | 22-Dec-07 at 12:36 pm | Permalink
Sask, I’m not interested in being nasty on a personal level, but I’ve had it with the CBA. “Best Activist Blog” is not what was requested. Not all feminists are activists.
I have gone through the categories and left requests to withdraw all the nominations I made. If I inadvertently missed one, just assume I want it gone and make it happen, please.
Dillon | 22-Dec-07 at 12:50 pm | Permalink
Don’t sweat it. All you can do is ignore the histrionics, and consider the root of the criticism to see if there is anything to it. I think you have done that, and come to the correct conclusion. This whole thing is just a difference of opinion, and you are probably not the Biggest Asshat in Canada (I think that honour belongs to a certain ex Prime Minister that has been in the news lately.)
BTW, that is a great picture!
CWTF | 22-Dec-07 at 12:59 pm | Permalink
Sometimes familiarity breeds contempt, but so too does ignorance. We like to think of ourselves as experts on other people and their intentions,
———————————–
Actually reading the crap produced by the BT is enough to confirm that they are for the most part idiots. I don’t know why that collective seems to be populated by twits. Maybe a study into their dementia is in order…
Dave | 22-Dec-07 at 1:02 pm | Permalink
What Chimera said.
Feminism isn’t just activism. By lumping them in with “Activists” you have diluted the subject. Intentionally from the look of it.
Northern BC Dipper | 22-Dec-07 at 1:33 pm | Permalink
Oh! you were brave enough to stand up to bullies! And try to come up with categories that would work for everybody!
You, sir, are the Biggest Asshat in Canada
;)
Frank Frink | 22-Dec-07 at 3:13 pm | Permalink
Sweet Jeebus Saskboy,
If there was one thing you might have learned from all this it should have been ‘put down the frickin’ shovel’, but nooooooooo….
CWTF | 22-Dec-07 at 3:26 pm | Permalink
Frank, maybe Saskboy like the attention or is a closet masochist…
Saskboy | 22-Dec-07 at 3:47 pm | Permalink
LuLu, thanks for the correction, I had no idea.
==
“Not all feminists are activists.”
No kidding? Perhaps that’s why feminism blogs are also acceptable in the GLBT category since feminists tend to be in favour of gender/sexual equality too? Not to mention they are allowed in any of the other categories also, since there are [probably] very few feminist bloggers who write 50% or more about topics pertaining to feminism, aside from the posts being written by a feminist.
It’s not like we’re trying to funnel feminists away from attention, in fact they now have two categories where their title, methods, or ideals are explicitly listed in the eligibility criteria. This isn’t about excluding feminism from the CBAs. It’s about a group not getting precisely what they requested, so they’d rather make a huge scene than act in a more measured way. Because it appears everyone in the political blogosphere enjoys/respects a big blow-up more than reasonable discussion.
Berlynn | 22-Dec-07 at 9:17 pm | Permalink
Like I said, obtuse and insecure. BINGO!!!
Peter Rempel | 22-Dec-07 at 9:55 pm | Permalink
“Dana’s actually a man. A little research never killed anyone but, hey, why take the chance, right?”
Yeah! Why didn’t you fly to Dana’s hometown and pull his pants down to check, you lazy bastard? That is what counts as “research” to Lulu, right, pulling unsuspecting mens’ pants down? What exactly is everybody complaining here paying you for, anyway? Oh wait…
When did blogs come to be written exclusively by whiny little bitches?
Saskboy | 23-Dec-07 at 12:14 am | Permalink
And while I’m blog navel gazing, I see my hit counter rolled past 300,000 today. Congrats Saskboy hunters.
Did you bag your limit yet?
Ashley | 23-Dec-07 at 2:46 am | Permalink
Sweet Jeebus Saskboy,
If there was one thing you might have learned from all this it should have been ‘put down the frickin’ shovel’, but nooooooooo….
—————
Saskboy can’t put down the shovel, as he feels he must always be right in every internet-related conflict. Someone needs to grow up.
sheena | 23-Dec-07 at 7:00 am | Permalink
…..as Ashley picks up the discarded shovel and wades right in…
Ashley | 23-Dec-07 at 12:30 pm | Permalink
yes, sheena, i cant put down shovels either
CWTF | 23-Dec-07 at 2:55 pm | Permalink
And while I’m blog navel gazing, I see my hit counter rolled past 300,000 today. Congrats Saskboy hunters.
Next time try to get the traffic for writting something smart instead of being a buffoon….
Saskboy | 23-Dec-07 at 3:11 pm | Permalink
CWTF, I see you posted from []. While there and picking one up for yourself, do you think you could grab an extra for me?
CWTF | 23-Dec-07 at 5:07 pm | Permalink
Sure, if you feel the need….
Chimera | 23-Dec-07 at 5:29 pm | Permalink
“This isn’t about excluding feminism from the CBAs.”
Hey, if it looks like a duck, waddles like a duck, quacks like a duck, start picking the buckshot out of its ass and set the table for dinner!
Wow, A whole two categories. Neither of which fits the idea of feminism.
You just do not want to get it, do you?
Ashley | 24-Dec-07 at 8:13 am | Permalink
Thanks Chimera. My thoughts exactly