Leader’s Debate in Saskatchewan called a win for Karwacki
Wednesday, October 31st, 2007This first appeared on SaskVotes.com
(Caution, I’m going to let a little of my partisanship slip out in this post. Debate is encouraged, and I won’t even turn my back on you, because unlike Lorne Calvert, you’ve got a shot at being Premier in the future.)
What kind of person from Saskatchewan hasn’t heard the term, “beer run” before? I guess border townies hear it more often. It refers to the tendency of raucous young men (mostly) making day trips to the US, simply to drink their inferior beer. Anyway, that has been the loudest complaint about Sask Liberal leader David Karwacki’s performance last night. There has also been a lot of comments on Brad Wall’s tie, and Lorne Calvert’s plain suit. Who are these witty debate fashion pundits anyway?
It seems the online opposition to David Karwacki has voiced their complaints about his behaviour loud enough that he’s the talk of the debate. And I can’t help but feel good about that, because the Sask Liberals have most of the best policies, and the best shot at changing the back-room dynamic that has infested the Legislature for far too long. Who was asking questions about Victoria Park Capital’s transparency before Calvert started poking at Wall’s “Enterprise Saskatchewan”? And who was pointing out the hypocrisy of the Sask Party and NDP MLAs taking “gold plated” health care packages?
From the Leader-Post:
While Karwacki generally evenly doled out his criticism (he accused Calvert of having to raise the PST two-percentage points to meet NDP spending and scolded Wall for using Ontario Conservative leader Mike Harris’s economists to balance the Sask. Party platform) a couple of the Liberal Leader’s comments and gestures towards Calvert may have been especially damaging.
One such quip was suggesting to Calvert that his universal prescription drug plan should cover truth serum.
However, the most damning thing Karwacki did — one of the lasting images from the debate — was constantly turning his back to Calvert and addressing remarks to Wall who Karwacki kept saying will be the next Premier of Saskatchewan.
It often seemed as if Karwacki was the only one fighting this debate with both gloves off.
It just can’t get much better for a 3rd running leader. That is, until election day, and the province decides they don’t want a two party system when a third party presents such a forceful alternative to the bi-partisan bickering of Wall and Calvert. Why have bi-partisan disagreements, when you can have a third party to state the obvious, with no fear?
Sphere: Related Content


@hotmail.com