If you don’t know what the future will hold, it’s harder to make sound investment decisions. It seems obvious to me that many people are ignorant of the costs we will consider to be too great. How else could we explain the sale of more than a few thousand SUVs a year in the world?
Why are we directing investment of citizens into vehicles and even housing that we know is obsolete and excessively wasteful? We don’t sell 486 computers anymore because even though they get most jobs done, they waste resources (eg. time, energy). People buy dual-core CPUs now because they get the same job done that a 486 can do, but in less than half the time, and by using less power. Where’s the sense in buying an SUV (486) that gets 15 Miles Per Gallon (MPG) of gasoline, when you can transport 6 people in an efficient vehicle (dual-core) that gets 30 MPG? Using half the resource (gas) to accomplish the same goal (moving people/equipment) is what is known as efficiency, or SAVING MONEY!
I find it pretty surprising that John Baird ordered this report that determined the government isn’t educating people fast enough on what to do about major purchases/investments. Unfortunately, Baird’s shown himself to be completely useless when it comes to implementing sound environmental policy. His government has done nothing positive on the subject in their 18 months in office, which is completely pitiful. For a so-called mainstream party to not have a workable environment plan upon their election is a disgrace. They’ve been begged by the Green Party to steal the Green Party Green Plan, but still there’s no acting from the now vacationing House.
Unless Canada acts immediately to put a price tag on greenhouse gas emissions, the government risks causing “serious economic dislocation,” an Environment Canada-sponsored report warned Wednesday.
In order to avoid the economic fallout, the report by the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy recommends that Ottawa begin clearly mapping out the costs of emissions.
If companies and consumers have enough advance notice about the financial incentives for reducing emissions, they can make appropriate environmental and investment decisions, the paper says.
“If the government neglects to clearly communicate the [greenhouse gas] price schedule well in advance, it risks causing serious economic dislocation…because society’s capital stocks will not be well prepared,” the report warns.
“In essence, inadequate and delayed communication by the government of a [greenhouse gas] ‘price’ could lead to substantial long-term economic costs.”
“Economic dislocation,” is simply a polite phrase for, “Canadians are being totally screwed by Conservative economic disorganization”.
Sphere: Related Content