Greg has an excellent analysis about why the Dion-May pact is happening, and how we can stave off the need for deals like this in future elections. The article is short, so take a minute to read it over.
The problem is caused by our First Past the Post elections, which skew the number of representatives elected to favour a two party race. Since we’re trying to fit many parties into this system, we need our elections to adapt and become more Proportional in nature, so that so called third parties don’t “split the vote” by weakening support for only one of the two candidates at the top of the race.
==
The Backroom Myth
The bloggers calling May a “backroom dealer” have a lot of nerve if they don’t support featuring the Green party in the televised leaders debates.
“The broadcasting consortium says that the decision about who is invited to participate in the leaders’ debates is made “on editorial grounds” and explained that in this (the 2006) election, the consortium has only invited the leaders of the four most prominent parties with representation in the House of Commons.”
If you want to talk about “backroom deals” you don’t get much more “backroom” than the broadcasting consortium deciding which parties will be seen by Canadian TV watchers. That’s where the subversion of democracy takes place in this country, not a discussion between two elected party leaders preparing party strategy for an election.
I think if you read over www.demanddemocraticdebates.ca you’ll agree that there are benefits for the country and our democracy if more parties are included in televised leaders debates. Don’t just add the Greens, but add other registered parties. It adheres closer to the Election Act that way, and more information on Canadian representatives isn’t a bad thing. Conservatives whine that the CBC doesn’t act its role of the public broadcaster enough. So why don’t they set aside a few hours either late at night, or in prime time, and tape delay or broadcast leaders debating live during the campaign? Is hearing more Peter Mansbridge really doing more for our country than listening to people running for office? CBC TV should be educating the public as well as entertaining, and many people find debates to be both educational and entertaining.
–
Scott has more.
And there are all sorts of desperate NDP partisans trying to shut the barn door after the horses have already escaped. (Oh my, this is the second time writing today when I’ve referred to May or the Greens as “horses” figuratively speaking.) I can only say that it’s nice for the Greens to finally be noticed. And I predicted a while ago that the way it would happen would be when the NDP couldn’t stop attacking after some bold move by the Green leader. The Greens are the new Liberals, only in that they are the new target of the NDP attack machine that Layton has based his victory strategy upon.
==
I should note I suppose, on a different subject, that I was contacted by a journalist/ism student at Carleton and am a thesis research subject. I gave a 30 minute interview about my blog and blog habits, over the phone on Tuesday and will probably be poked and prodded no further to the end of the study. I’m anticipating better results than the work of a professor out of Calgary who generalized bloggers as people who are more lonely than “normal” people.